Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nano 3G"
(Created page with "Audio-codec ? How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ? The only references to this chip on the internets are on ipod-liberating sites who all seem to be quoting the...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Audio-codec ? | Audio-codec ? | ||
| + | |||
How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ? | How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ? | ||
| + | |||
The only references to this chip on the internets are on | The only references to this chip on the internets are on | ||
ipod-liberating sites who all seem to be quoting the same single source. | ipod-liberating sites who all seem to be quoting the same single source. | ||
| + | |||
There is no mentioning of this chip on the 'wolfson'-site, no data-sheets | There is no mentioning of this chip on the 'wolfson'-site, no data-sheets | ||
to be found anywhere, etc etc .. | to be found anywhere, etc etc .. | ||
Revision as of 15:55, 30 October 2011
Audio-codec ?
How do we actually know that the 3G-nano uses WM1870 ?
The only references to this chip on the internets are on ipod-liberating sites who all seem to be quoting the same single source.
There is no mentioning of this chip on the 'wolfson'-site, no data-sheets to be found anywhere, etc etc ..
Doesn't it make more business-sense that the nano 3G would use the same codec as the other ipod released in 2007 ('Classic')?
